Interim plan to move away from the mongo tarball

[Mark Ramm]

On Wed 27 Mar 2013 05:06:15 PM EST, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Mark Ramm
> <mark.ramm-christensen at canonical.com> wrote:
>> I don't believe the solution you describe is being ignored.
>>
>> There has  been significant discussion around the tarball solution and a non
>> trivial amount of effort to make it work.
>
> I'm not referring to the tarball solution. If you don't take the time
> to actually read the thread, the conversation is very unproductive.
>
>
> gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net

I did read it.  I take it that you are now referring to the " 
bootstrapping only happens on the specific series that the respective 
juju in use was deployed on" I'm sorry if I was confused about that -- 
I did read the thread, and was interested in discussion on locking down 
the bootstrap node to the "current" series, but thought that perhaps 
you were still also arguing for the tarball solution -- particularly 
since you said in the e-mail I replied to "if you can't spare the time 
to build a tarball with binaries, nothing else will do."

Anyway, sorry for the confusion.