constraints - observations and questions (bringing to list)

[Tim Penhey]

On 14/02/13 06:42, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:27 PM, William Reade
> <william.reade at canonical.com> wrote:
>> +100 -- I do not think it's acceptable to take that language off the
>> table. But it's not quite so simple: the goal is that a script written
>> for provider X should have the best possible chance of Just Working on
>> provider Y.
> 
> Agreed, and it should also be possible to have a script built that
> works on provider X, Y, and Z, with intended results.

Epiphany strikes...

This script you are mentioning is some script full of juju commands
complete with constraints?

Do you have a use-case in mind that drives this?

Tim