[ANN] juju-core 1.9.7 has been released

[David Cheney]

Understood, I will drop the experimental tag.

On 06/02/13 11:01, Mark Ramm wrote:
> On Tue 29 Jan 2013 10:19:40 AM CET, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, roger peppe
>> <roger.peppe at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> If we say this then I think we should commit to actually changing the
>>> major version number when we change in an incompatible way.
>>> Alternatively we could say that we do not intend to provide backward
>>> compatibility for the time being while things are changing fast.
>>
>> We agreed long ago that our version number scheme would only
>> include odd numbers when they are unstable releases, and for those
>> we'd not provide compatibility guarantees because we're still
>> developing it. That's where the "9" in 1.9.7 originally comes from.
>
> So, let's just be explicit about this in the release notes where we talk
> about known issues, and then drop experimental tag up front.
>
> We will also have OpenStack support to mention in this next cycle, so
> that will be a big milestone.   Anything else ready to land?
>