fwts V0.25.04-rc2 release review

Colin Ian King colin.king at canonical.com
Mon Jun 25 08:23:35 UTC 2012


On 25/06/12 09:21, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 25/06/12 08:54, Alex Hung wrote:
>> I got a failed item sometimes (approx. 50%~75%).
>>
> This is not a regression, it's been happening on the locking/unlocking
> mutex test in the method test for quite a while. It seems to happen
> randomly and it needs looking at.  I am pretty sure it's related to the
> timings on a multi-threaded environment, but I've not been able yet to
> figure this one out.  Lets file a bug against this failure, but I am
> reluctant for this known bug to stop release.

I'll file a bug right now and assign it to me.

>
> Colin
>
>> On 06/25/2012 02:18 PM, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
>>> Dear all:
>>>    There are some efforts in after the previous -rc1 review in fixing
>>> the CMOS check in the case that the ACPI tables are loaded from files.
>>>
>>>    The paches are:
>>>
>>>    [fwts V0.25.04-rc1..V0.25.04-rc2]
>>>
>>>      debian: Fix up the dependency of debian packages
>>>      [1/2] lib: fwts_acpi_tables: add ACPI table provenance
>>>      [2/2] apci: acpitables: only check CMOS in BOOT table from
>>> firmware tables (LP: #1016469)
>>>
>>>
>>>    [fwts-test V0.25.04-rc1..V0.25.04-rc2]
>>>
>>>      [1/2] arg-table-path-0001: update to keep in sync with fwts (LP:
>>> #1016469)
>>>      [2/2] acpidump-0001: update to keep in sync with fwts (LP:
>>> #1016469)
>>>
>>>
>>>    fwts and fwts-test V0.25.04-rc2 passes all the tests on my testing
>>> (failure.log attached).
>>>
>>>    As mentioned in the previous mail, I expect two ACKs on the release.
>>> And I think V0.25.04-rc2 is qualified to release, so
>>>
>>>    Tested-by: Keng-Yu Lin<kengyu at canonical.com>
>>>    Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin<kengyu at canonical.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>





More information about the fwts-devel mailing list