fwts V0.25.04-rc2 release review

Colin Ian King colin.king at canonical.com
Mon Jun 25 08:21:50 UTC 2012


On 25/06/12 08:54, Alex Hung wrote:
> I got a failed item sometimes (approx. 50%~75%).
>
This is not a regression, it's been happening on the locking/unlocking 
mutex test in the method test for quite a while. It seems to happen 
randomly and it needs looking at.  I am pretty sure it's related to the 
timings on a multi-threaded environment, but I've not been able yet to 
figure this one out.  Lets file a bug against this failure, but I am 
reluctant for this known bug to stop release.

Colin

> On 06/25/2012 02:18 PM, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
>> Dear all:
>>    There are some efforts in after the previous -rc1 review in fixing
>> the CMOS check in the case that the ACPI tables are loaded from files.
>>
>>    The paches are:
>>
>>    [fwts V0.25.04-rc1..V0.25.04-rc2]
>>
>>      debian: Fix up the dependency of debian packages
>>      [1/2] lib: fwts_acpi_tables: add ACPI table provenance
>>      [2/2] apci: acpitables: only check CMOS in BOOT table from
>> firmware tables (LP: #1016469)
>>
>>
>>    [fwts-test V0.25.04-rc1..V0.25.04-rc2]
>>
>>      [1/2] arg-table-path-0001: update to keep in sync with fwts (LP:
>> #1016469)
>>      [2/2] acpidump-0001: update to keep in sync with fwts (LP: #1016469)
>>
>>
>>    fwts and fwts-test V0.25.04-rc2 passes all the tests on my testing
>> (failure.log attached).
>>
>>    As mentioned in the previous mail, I expect two ACKs on the release.
>> And I think V0.25.04-rc2 is qualified to release, so
>>
>>    Tested-by: Keng-Yu Lin<kengyu at canonical.com>
>>    Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin<kengyu at canonical.com>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>





More information about the fwts-devel mailing list