[Bug 1088532] Re: pluging in a missing raid member does not (re)add it to array
ceg
1088532 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Dec 11 12:26:03 UTC 2012
** Description changed:
12.04.1 regression (worked before, maybe without the mentioned safety
check, but it worked)
(re-add refers to speeding up the sync using a bitmap)
The --incremental (udev) call refuses to (re)add a temporarily
diconnected member back to an already restarted (active) raid. (Even
thought the event count clearly shows its state is equal or older than
at the time the array was started (run) degraded.)
- And manually:
+ This seems to have come by an attempt to "fix" bug #557429, without considering the discussion bejond comment 68
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/mdadm/+bug/557429/comments/68
+
+
+ And when attempting to do it manually:
# mdadm /dev/md2 --re-add /dev/sda6
mdadm: --re-add for /dev/sda6 to /dev/md2 is not possible
+ (missing info: "bacause the array has no write intent bitmap")
# mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sda6
mdadm: /dev/sda6 reports being an active member for /dev/md2, but a --re-add fails.
mdadm: not performing --add as that would convert /dev/sda6 in to a spare.
mdadm: To make this a spare, use "mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda6" first.
+
This is not how things are supposed to work in times of hotpluging.
A warning/question if the device that is to be added contains newer data
than at its time of failure is appropriate, but otherwise, get the job
of adding that device back to its raid done!
+
+
+ To avoid regression:
+ Let --incremental (re)add members to running array again. Not doing so does not guard against running from alternating parts of an array anyway (if they come up in random order).
+
+ True fix:
+ Store the state of the event counter at the time of degradation in the superblock.
+ --incremental should continue to (re)add a device if the event count shows its state is equal or older than at the time the array degraded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to mdadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088532
Title:
pluging in a missing raid member does not (re)add it to array
Status in “mdadm” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
12.04.1 regression (worked before, maybe without the mentioned safety
check, but it worked)
(re-add refers to speeding up the sync using a bitmap)
The --incremental (udev) call refuses to (re)add a temporarily
diconnected member back to an already restarted (active) raid. (Even
thought the event count clearly shows its state is equal or older than
at the time the array was started (run) degraded.)
This seems to have come by an attempt to "fix" bug #557429, without considering the discussion bejond comment 68
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mdadm/+bug/557429/comments/68
And when attempting to do it manually:
# mdadm /dev/md2 --re-add /dev/sda6
mdadm: --re-add for /dev/sda6 to /dev/md2 is not possible
(missing info: "bacause the array has no write intent bitmap")
# mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sda6
mdadm: /dev/sda6 reports being an active member for /dev/md2, but a --re-add fails.
mdadm: not performing --add as that would convert /dev/sda6 in to a spare.
mdadm: To make this a spare, use "mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda6" first.
This is not how things are supposed to work in times of hotpluging.
A warning/question if the device that is to be added contains newer
data than at its time of failure is appropriate, but otherwise, get
the job of adding that device back to its raid done!
To avoid regression:
Let --incremental (re)add members to running array again. Not doing so does not guard against running from alternating parts of an array anyway (if they come up in random order).
True fix:
Store the state of the event counter at the time of degradation in the superblock.
--incremental should continue to (re)add a device if the event count shows its state is equal or older than at the time the array degraded.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1088532/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list