Is it just me, or is LTSP a mess?
R. Scott Belford
scott at hosef.org
Tue Sep 9 19:51:20 BST 2008
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Asmo Koskinen <asmo.koskinen at arkki.info>wrote:
> HP t5125, 5135.
Edubuntu has had an adverse and destructive effect on the adoption of Free
and Open Source Software in schools.
I think Asmo is the only person who has had success with Ubunut/Edubuntu,
and the brand new clients are a factor. Many of us use older computers as
thin clients. The Ubu/Edu documentation has been inconsistent on what thin
clients are supported. I have not yet looked at the LTS.CONF file for
Hardy, but it is likely a culprit in performance.
The question is what to do now. Eric Harrison is not as active with the
K12LTSP - and the K12LTSP is no more - it is becoming a Fedora Spin with
RedHat sponsorship. Warren Togami, fedora founder, is actively involved
with this. It is not ready for production, but bugs are being sought and
Debian-edu, aka Skolelinux, has a responsive mailing list, polite
developers, and a community will to do good in a responsible way. Perhaps
Ubuntu would be wise to build on this element of the Debian community, too.
The Hardy problems existed in Feisty. 7.04 was the only acceptable
thin-client server release. *NOTHING* critical in 7.10 appears to have been
addressed in 8.04 in spite of the heavy volume of traffic on this list.
Until someone upstream in the Ubu/Edu projects takes a pro-active and
cooperative stance, Canonical will continue to abuse the good work of its
education predecessors by falsely claiming to have a community-based
solution without the community.
I still volunteer to run the lab that prompted Warren to start the Fedora
project in Hawaii. It was a thin client lab until we moved to 7.10. This
completely destroyed the school's taste for thin clients. Now we use
stand-alone workstations with central authentication.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the edubuntu-users