Problems and Strategies in Financing Voluntary Free Software Projects
Knut Yrvin
knuty at skolelinux.no
Wed Aug 31 08:26:38 UTC 2005
Higlight
The Plone Foundation and SLX Debian Labs in Norway has effectively used the
funding of sprints to accomplish time-based development goals.
[...]
Progeny and Canonical (to name just two important examples) have done a much
better job than Red Hat in sustaining voluntary work in their volunteer
"upstream" project. Their models can provide inspiration to others following
a similar course.
Abstract
It's easier for a successful volunteer Free Software project to get
money than it is to decide how to spend it. While paying developers is
easy, it can carry unintended negative consequences. This essay
explores problems and benefits of paying developers in volunteer free
and open source projects and surveys strategies that projects have used
to successfully finance development while maintaining their volunteer
nature.
http://mako.cc/writing/funding_volunteers/
Regards
Knut Yrvin
More information about the edubuntu-devel
mailing list