Defining rotating chairs for the DMB meetings
Brian Murray
brian at ubuntu.com
Wed Jan 31 20:02:11 UTC 2024
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 09:54:03PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey Robie,
>
> Le 30/01/2024 à 18:54, Robie Basak a écrit :
> > If somebody has poorer attendance than the others, then we tend to end
> > up getting stuck because that person wasn't present when they were
> > supposed to chair, so they keep the nomination to be chair for next
> > time, and then they aren't there next time, and the cycle continues. So
> > we forever have someone nominated who isn't showing up.
>
> Well, it also means that if you miss the meeting where it was your turn then
> you end up not chairing before another 3.5 months. And if the chair/backup
> are missing then we end up having no deterministic process to select the
> chair and need to go back to 'wait for someone to step up'.
>
> Those are minors issues though, I will be happy to follow the consensus.
I am also +1 for having a defined chair but have no preference as to
scheduling method.
--
Brian Murray
More information about the Devel-permissions
mailing list