libreoffice PPU application

[Thomas Ward]

For all of the reasons already stated by Rafael and others, my vote is 
now a +1 on this as well.


Thomas


On 3/19/21 10:57 AM, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> To all DMB members:
>
>> I’m not only stating that because of the answer to “how would you 
>> deal with an upload from someone else” or “what would you do in case 
>> something was solved differently by you and someone else”. I’m saying 
>> that also because Rico’s description of the role seemed a lot close 
>> to how upstream solo projects are driven (with 1 or 2 maintainers 
>> defining project’s future) and not how we do things (with the nobody 
>> is is 100% responsible for one thing mindset).
>>
>> Note: I’m not criticising one way or another, just stating the 
>> mindset is different.
>
> This concern has been addressed and enlightened at:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ricotz/PPULibreofficeApplication in 
> ‘Clarification’ session.
>
>> With all that stated, I don’t have a reason to think Rico would _not_ 
>> be up to the role but, at this point in time, I think clarifying 
>> nuances between the Ubuntu project/role and Canonical team jobs/roles 
>> is definitely something that should happen before we re-consider this 
>> application.
>
> This concern was a misunderstanding based on recent clarifications. I 
> think that there was a language barrier during the DMB interview for 
> this specific part, based on recent feedback I got from other DMB 
> members.
>
>> For that reason my vote is also __-1__ for:
>>
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ricotz/PPULibreofficeApplication
>
> Rico has clarified a few misunderstood items of his application as 
> well as was opened for some community role lecture from other DMB 
> members.
>
> Because of that I am changing my vote from -1 to +1 for his application.
>
>> I hope that Rico becomes closer and closer up to a point he can help 
>> us in other things as well (MOTU / core), hopefully.
>
> This part still applies!
>
> Thanks for your application Rico and thank you for being patient about 
> our process as well.
>
> -rafaeldtinoco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20210322/df38cf56/attachment.html>