Please vote by email: Rosco2 and the ubuntustudio packageset

[Ross Gammon]

No apologies necessary Mathieu.

Thanks to the DMB for all the encouragement and constructive criticism.
And to all the various sponsors and helpers along the way (including all
the fantastic Ubuntu Studio team members).

Regardless of the size of the package set, I am just grateful that:
1. Ubuntu Studio lives on.
2. I will be less of a burden on all of the busy sponsors!

Cheers,

Ross

On 3/26/19 3:51 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> My apologies; seems I can't math right.
>
> With Jeremy's vote; this amounts to a passing motion (4 +1s achieved,
> thus a net >0 vote).
>
> Congrats Ross, and on behalf of the DMB; all my apologies for the
> trouble and confusion.
>
> Kindly,
>
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <cyphermox at ubuntu.com>
> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu.tl at gmail.com
> 4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2  CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
> <cyphermox at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> We're still missing one positive vote for this motion to pass, tbh.
>>
>> TL;dr: please vote on the amended proposition below.
>>
>> Since Micah is often unreachable (sorry Micah if you see these, and
>> intended to respond -- I don't want to put words in your mouth or
>> anything, just trying to make this process simpler for everyone); and
>> given the relative urgency of addressing the situation:
>>
>> There was further discussion among DMB members, and it seems we are
>> mostly in agreement about Ross' upload rights for the UbuntuStudio
>> packageset, when that packageset is defined as being the contents of
>> the image, minus the intersection of anything covered by other flavour
>> packagesets (ie. Steve's proposal on the March 12 meeting).
>>
>> Further, understanding that the DMB is considering to revise the
>> definition of flavour packagesets to be these "narrow" sets (no
>> overlap between flavours), and encourage developers to apply for MOTU
>> or core-dev upload rights (and grandfather this where appropriate: ie.
>> this might just be rubber-stamping);
>>
>> I've applied the necessary changes to the packageset script; these are
>> meant to be temporary; where we can re-extend the scope of the
>> packagesets, or make this permanent and strongly encourage Ross and
>> other developers to apply for MOTU to cover any overlap between
>> flavours.
>>
>>
>>
>> AMENDED PROPOSITION:
>>
>> To grant Ross upload rights for the updated ubuntustudio packageset
>> (narrowed down to eliminate overlap between flavours); see
>> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/73m6JC3tr8/.
>>
>>
>> Kindly,
>>
>> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <cyphermox at ubuntu.com>
>> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu.tl at gmail.com
>> 4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2  CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:34 AM Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:47 AM Robie Basak <robie.basak at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>>>     Please vote on: give Rosco2 upload rights to the ubuntustudio
>>>>     packageset - so to the current packageset and however it will look
>>>>     in the nearest future
>>> I vote +1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeremy Bicha
>>>
>>> --
>>> Devel-permissions mailing list
>>> Devel-permissions at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/devel-permissions