PPU / packageset applications and membership

[Iain Lane]

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:07:28PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> > 
> > This says that we split the rights, but that we didn't expect people to
> > have to say that they want membership too, and also that we wouldn't
> > explicitly membership either unless to grant upload rights without it.
> 
> Is there a word missing in the above sentence?

explicitly *consider*

> 
> > Basically the default case, unless we say otherwise, should be to grant
> > membership. That's what I'm asking us to confirm.
> 
> If you mean membership in the "ubuntumembers" team for those who don't
> already have it. I agree.
> 
> Additionally, reviewing the email thread you provided I believe
> ubuntu-dev is the appropriate team for teward as he was already an
> Ubuntu member.

~ubuntu-dev.

I'm saying that we at the time intended this non-membership thing to be
an *exception*, and in most cases we will not even mention membership
because it is implied. We will only mention it if we want to give
someone upload rights without membership.

That is: most people join ~ubuntu-dev when they get PPU/packageset
rights. In the rare other cases they will go to ~ubuntu-uploaders. No I
don't know why Sergio is in -uploaders.

I believe Micah has a different recollection.

-- 
Iain Lane                                  [ iain at orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer                                   [ laney at debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer                                   [ laney at ubuntu.com ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20150804/a0b55cae/attachment.pgp>