bzr/brz & integration with git(hub)
gour at atmarama.com
Fri Jan 12 09:55:12 UTC 2018
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:25:56 +0800
Jelmer Vernooĳ <jelmer at jelmer.uk> wrote:
> What Martin means when he says "using the git format locally" is that
> rather than focus on a two way bridge, we want Breezy to support the
> git format natively. This means that e.g. 'brz clone
> git://github.com/foo/bar' creates the same bytes on disk (with a .git
> directory) as 'git clone git://github.com/foo/bar'.
I suppose this is meant after 3.0 release, right?
> The problem with creating a native bazaar repository locally and
> pushing from there to a remote git repository is that every
> interaction between to different formats is inherently slow because
> it requires converting data from one format to the other.
Yeah, that's clear there must me trade-off while working with the two
> We'd still allow pushing from a native bzr repo into a git one and
> vice versa, but this should be an uncommon situation.
What is night for all beings is the time of awakening
for the self-controlled; and the time of awakening for
all beings is night for the introspective sage.
It is far better to discharge one's prescribed duties, even though
faultily, than another's duties perfectly. Destruction in the course
of performing one's own duty is better than engaging in another's
duties, for to follow another's path is dangerous.
More information about the bazaar