CVS "just works?"

[Thorsten Glaser]

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, JP Vossen wrote:

> have to disagree there.  CVS is fundamentally broken because of the way it
> does everything "per file."

For a *lot* of workloads, this is better than the models
used by svn, bzr or *shudder* git.

Really.

Do not dismiss CVS in general.

I will stop here because this is the bzr list, but I
could bring lots of arguments and the like. But I can’t
accept baseless flaming of my favourite VCS, especially
when wrong (for some uses). Don’t get me wrong, I don’t
say CVS is right for every use case either, but…………………

(Feel free to bash svn though ☻)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
«MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. »
“mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends
from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a
flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to
be a database”	‣‣‣ Please, http://deb.li/mysql and MariaDB, finally die!