Call for testing of colocated branch support in bzr.dev
eliz at gnu.org
Fri Jan 20 14:30:09 UTC 2012
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:57:03 +0100
> From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org>
> CC: bazaar <bazaar at lists.canonical.com>
> >>> This is great news, but is it wise to put in 2.5.0 something that
> >>> (AFAIK) was not in any of the 2.5 beta releases?
> >>> Apologies if I'm missing something.
> >> The development-colo format has been in the 2.5 series since one of the
> >> earlier betas. It's basically the same thing as 2a except that it has a
> >> different format string, and an extra directory "branches" which gets
> >> created as soon as you create colocated branches.
> > I meant the 2a format _after_ the merge. That one was never seen in
> > the 2.5 series, right?
> It was, under the name "development-colo". There is no other difference
> between that format and 2a as it exists in bzr.dev at the moment.
Then what is the essence of "merging" it into 2a?
More information about the bazaar