what should be done to merge nested trees patch to bzr-core?

[Alexander Belchenko]

Marius Kruger пишет:
> On 14 June 2011 11:37, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
>> I've been thinking about nested trees design and implementation since we've
>> talked about it last year at Bazaar sprint at La-Hulpe with Marius Kruger. I
>> have some new information about scmproj usage and my thoughts about how I
>> see nested trees, and I want to share that with the list.
>>
>> I also have questions about Aaron's nested trees design, but the most
>> interesting for me: what is blocked this proposal?
>>
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/bzr/nested-trees-composite-tree/+merge/6264
> 
> Thanks for raising this.
> I sort of gave up on this since I'm only a mortal with a day job (and
> a new baby since Feb), although I still dream about it.
> I read Aaron the rockstar's documentation and his implementation
> seemed really complete to me.

What documentation exactly do you have in mind? (I've been wondering 
about "Aaron the rockstar's documentation" for a while and haven't been 
sure do you mean "Aaron the Rockstar", or "rockstar's documentation", 
sorry, bad bad bialix with bad bad English).

> The feedback I got at that sprint was that we really need a proof of
> concept in a plugin even if it has its own experimental format and
> experimental commands and additional hooks.
> People are concerned about performance and other impacts.

I'd be happy to move some nested trees functionality to scmproj or 
bzr-externals. They're already have some bits to help dogfooding this stuff.