[Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [rfc] bzr-colo into core

[Gordon Tyler]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/23/2011 9:49 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 09:29 -0400, Gordon Tyler wrote:
>> On 3/23/2011 8:53 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>> I think it would be confusing for "bzr branch" to create more than one
>>> branch. Perhaps this is a good opportunity to remove the "clone" alias
>>> from "bzr branch" and turn it into its own command? "bzr clone" could
>>> create a full clone of the remote control dir, including all of the
>>> branches present.

>> Good point. That would change `bzr branch` to be solely for creating
>> branching in an existing local repo? `bzr clone` would be the command
>> for fetching remote repos or standalone branches.

> It would still be used for cloning individual branches rather than
> collections of branches (for which clone would be used), so it would
> stay consistent with the current bzr behaviour. 

Why not use the clone command for all forms of cloning? It would seem
more consistent to me. I want to clone this standalone branch from this
dir to this other dir.

Ciao,
Gordon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNigJLAAoJEIrPJfWinA2uO78H/iWo5Q+5xcc3XacWBATrIQpH
fwcYzIOSu33V4qY5/vthO0lx/UK485w4YBm7/tO+nS833oX4Xewfndh+s7snR/GD
1GRB+YL/asiy7IATHk+G6piiRj3huLH9IyQCDrj24eLDPxuB4xgwNDLOq9Si9aSm
PHm2BQfuOwnpPvD3AX8WoJTS8UakbRHPxaYXX4xRfWUQVt/NbiZPqpKFyedSpFkb
TDkXi1gPaIqY9BorerIDIREPGeO6niAYfqnK/eUnGVl15tj8ZkRGYF2m5UlZLeWD
yigonNt246mqCinsHTKiYT5D98T0eSZQXNFEyfzM09HBBQJ/Yor81ElCvAlRYEo=
=zsbQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----