"log -rdate:" and "log -cdate:"

[Martin Pool]

On 30 November 2010 08:23, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu.org> wrote:
>> > But why did I need to extend the date range by one more day,
>> > when both changes show 2010-10-08 in the log results?
>>
>> I suspect, without checking the code, this is because we're filtering
>> in your timezone but by default showing the timestamps in the tz in
>> which they were committed
>
> IMO, that's an inconsistency that should be fixed.  As a matter of
> fact, I took the date from a ChangeLog entry, which is in UTC.

I agree.  Perhaps we should show and interpret dates in the (viewer's)
local tz by default?

>> (you can change that.)

bzr log --timezone=local/original/utc

> Let me know if I should do something to help in advancing fix of these
> issues.

Hm, probably just patches at this point, or checking there are clear
bugs for them.

-- 
Martin