[RFC] Releases planning

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/7/2010 6:12 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 8 October 2010 10:02, Max Bowsher <maxb at f2s.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I'd like to know too :) Hey packagers ! What do you think ?
>>
>> Most scenarios of packaging do not package all released series,
>> generally sticking only to latest stable and latest beta. Thus, it's not
>> really an issue.
> 
> True.
> 
>>> - still backport bugfixes targeted at debian or Ubuntu for the 2.0
>>>   series, but in the packaging branch instead of our lp:bzr/2.0 or
>>>   lp:bzr/2.1 branches... which would make a good dogfood exercise...
>>
>> I submit that 2.0 is of zero interest at this point. Ubuntu lucid and
>> Debian squeeze are on 2.1.x. The only Ubuntu series on 2.0 is karmic,
>> which has a mere ~6 months of support left.
> 
> That makes sense too.
> 

Except I believe that is why we slated 2.0 to have ... *6 more months*
of support. So yes, it is a "mere 6 months", but we were trying to match it.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyuVQEACgkQJdeBCYSNAANeHgCfUyFI7upyf/MMUF7unJ4FIY1C
d/AAoJ4b1HalWESeWseC+5Upsa2ArQRC
=a58L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----