Q: Access Control Options
maxb at f2s.com
Wed Sep 29 11:34:15 BST 2010
On 29/09/10 04:37, Maritza Mendez wrote:
> Looks that way to me, too. I think we need to identify a chokepoint
> in the smartserver to intercept every access and check against a
> per-branch authorization. The auth could be cached (with finite TTL)
> to minimize overhead. I may have a look at the code just for fun.
A very interesting project, I think, would be to see how Launchpad wraps
the smart server to add its own ideas of access control and
non-filesystem branch namespace. If only I had the tuits...
> On 9/28/10, David Muir <davidkmuir at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Maritza Mendez wrote:
>>> Have you tried the contrib/bzr_access script within the bzr source
>>> I have not, but it looks exactly like the kind of thing I think I'd be
>>> aiming for if I ever manage to promote Bazaar sufficiently within
>>> my own
>>> I was not aware of this. Thanks for the pointer. I will check it out.
>> AFAIK, it does not do fine-grained control over individual branches.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100929/5c5496c6/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the bazaar