Bazaar Explorer and GTK
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Sat Aug 14 10:29:28 BST 2010
Ben Finney пишет:
> Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> writes:
>
>> Initially that was true. I'm not sure whether it's still the case and
>> would also doubt that anybody is actually using that particular
>> combination. QBzr is well ahead of bzr-gtk these days.
>>
>> The main thing bzr-gtk provides that QBzr doesn't as far as I'm aware
>> is tighter integration into the GNOME desktop and a native toolkit.
>> Neither of these is an advantage when using bzr-gtk inside of
>> bzr-explorer.
>
> Yes, those advantages are what I'm seeking. I like what I read about
> Bazaar Explorer, but I would much prefer it to be well-integrated with
> the GNOME desktop and use native GTK widgets.
Unlikely. At least I (as current maintainer of bzr-explorer) has no
desire to do so.
> Would the developers of Bazaar Explorer please comment on this aspect?
> Was it ever the case that it provided the above advantages? How far has
> it diverged since then?
Bazaar Explorer is cross-platform GUI application. There is no intent
to provide any special integration with desktop beyond the
cross-platform support in Qt itself.
More to say: Qt framework can be used on Linux, Mac and Windows
without big problems. While GTK is mainly dedicated to Linux. The
choice is obvious.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list