Bazaar dirstate locking (was: lock_* API change)
Eli Zaretskii
eliz at gnu.org
Tue May 18 08:23:57 BST 2010
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org>
> Cc: robertc at robertcollins.net,
> bazaar at lists.canonical.com,
> monnier at iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:46:03 +0900
>
> It allows you to streamline the workflow without switching from Emacs.
> Most Emacs developers value that, as you know. I'm surprised that you
> place so little weight on it.
I value Emacs features, not use of Emacs as a simple shell for
invoking commands (unless their main product is their stdout output).
> And I did then and still do think that the workflow that several
> people, starting with RMS and including you and Óscar, have advocated
> is an abuse of a DVCS. Certainly, bound branches and lightweight
> checkouts are convenient for some purposes, especially so for testers
> and casual developers
You are confusing me with someone else. I never advocated CVS-like
workflow, not since I started using Bazaar. In fact, I posted not so
long ago (on emacs-devel) a few details about my workflows, which use
local branches quite a lot, and how that improved my quality of life.
You even thanked me for speaking up.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list