plugins vs builtins

[Parth Malwankar]

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com> wrote:
> Oh, one other point:
>
> * Code review: a bit of a double edged implement.  Some times in the
> past our reviews have been too slow or more picky than was useful.  On
> the other hand I often find them helpful, and I think we are now doing
> better at being both prompt and fluent (but probably could improve
> still more).
>
> Therefore: if people are keeping things in plugins because merging to
> core looks too hard, we should fix that.  On the other hand if people
> want a way to get reviews for plugin code, as Parth did, we should
> accommodate them too.  We could do that by subscribing for proposals
> on the plugin branches, including a review starting from null.
>

I suppose reliable plugins that have been reviewed by bzr experts is
what I was calling as "blessed" plugins in my other mail on this subject.
I feel having a process to ensure the quality of plugins is very important.

Regards,
Parth

> --
> Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>
>
>