Bazaar still below the radar when evaluating VCS tools
Danny van Heumen
danny at dannyvanheumen.nl
Tue Feb 23 00:21:17 GMT 2010
Gordon Tyler wrote:
[snip]
> I think my point is more that Launchpad doesn't really promote public
> sharing of a branch without all the paraphernalia of project setup.
>
I can find myself in this remark.
When I first tried to submit a patch I was even searching for *the* way
to do it. (Now I know how, but that's not the point.)
Now ... I haven't done much in open source / public development yet, but
I do know that when I'd start a project, it would be more or less just
fiddling around with a new idea. That means, create a repository, play
around with some code and see where it goes from there.
I would probably like to do the exact same thing when I start/put
something on a public server. Just dump this branch somewhere, (share
the URL with some folks who are also interested) and start fiddling.
I guess I would be interested in something like a "drop"-site and start
working. And once it's worthy of title "project" I would like to "build"
a project around the branches.
I think Launchpad probably is a bit "scary" (or maybe overkill is a
better word) because of all the project-related features and all those
features are immediately visible and "clutter" the site. I wouldn't even
want to think about any project-related features.
(Note: I haven't started a project on Launchpad yet, so this is actually
an assumption - based on the impression Launchpad gives me. So I may be
completely wrong, but even then this information would be valueable right?)
So, these are my two cents worth of thoughts. (Hope they're useful ;-)
Danny
PS: Maybe create a "http://droppad.net/" interface to launchpad servers
that just offers a simple, fast interface for the starting user. Who can
later on log in to Launchpad and build up the project around his
existing branches.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list