Contributor agreement

[Brian de Alwis]

On 26-Jan-2010, at 12:38 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> It sounds a bit like you're conflating this with the earlier question
> of reasonable costs.  Our main concern is with the burden on the
> contributor: _I_ am perfectly happy to verify gpg signatures with
> trust chains, but this would make it hard on many contributors.  At
> any rate if you can think of a better solution I would be happy to
> hear it.

Since most proposals are intended to be accepted through LaunchPad, why not have the contributor initiate joining the Canonical Contributor Agreement group.  If they've lost control over their account, they likely have a bigger problem on their hands than being subscribed to the contributor group.

Brian.

--
On bike helmets: "If you think your hair is more important than your brain, you're probably right."  (B. J. Wawrykow)