'bzr blame' fails with ghost revisions and 'bzr check' output...

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


...

>> I would like to understand why it thinks there is an inconsistency. In
>> new formats both the revision graph and the revision should claim "B, C"
>> as the parents of D. Even though C isn't present. (knit formats could
>> not represent a not-present 'C' parent.)
> 
> In my case, the graph looks more like:
> A
> |\
> | B
> | |
> | C
> | |
> | D
> |/
> E
> 
> So the parents for E is both A and D.  But in the inventory (I
> assume), it knows that C is a (text) parent of D.  It's complaining
> about the fact that C is missing.  Does that make sense?
> 
> -John
> 

Right, so after going to svn and then back to bzr, at the *revision*
level you end up with:

A
|
| ? # D something
|/
E

At the inventory level, some things probably reference any of B, C, D.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAktMlMwACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOXUACgq+UKia6cIq3CmBFtypFtVGKy
f5MAoJ3GP5MAcQRCx3UpuOPQpyBc7Eci
=9Czc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----