'bzr blame' fails with ghost revisions and 'bzr check' output...

[Ian Clatworthy]

John Arbash Meinel wrote:

> The idea
> behind ghosts was that we could mark "and there is some ancestry here",
> such that if someone *else* had access to the repo and did the
> conversion, then when we merged from them, it would fill in our gaps.

John,

Perhaps you could put together a help topic on ghosts explaining the
idea behind them and giving some user tips when they are encountered? It
would be great to see "Ghosts" in the concepts section of the new look
User Reference:
http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/en/user-reference/index.html.

Ian C.