[RFC] branch --bind
Juanma Barranquero
lekktu at gmail.com
Fri Jan 8 23:41:43 GMT 2010
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 21:24, Matthew D. Fuller
<fullermd at over-yonder.net> wrote:
> I'm unhappy with it doing what you're making it do NOW though, because
> we don't HAVE bound branches; we have something that's maybe 75% bound
> branch and 25% heavy checkout.
In this thread, it has been said that
- heavyweight checkouts == bound branches
- heavyweight checkouts /= bound branches
- heavyweight checkouts ~= bound branches
- and now, that "bound branches" are ~75% ur-bound-branches and ~25%
heavyweight checkouts.
and there's not a place in the docs that really define these concepts,
so a newbie can understand their similarities and differences (bzr
help checkouts being closer, but lacking).
So I agree with Eli's comment that "the main problem is that they use
obscure phrases or terminology that is not explained where it is used,
sometimes not explained anywhere."
Juanma
More information about the bazaar
mailing list