jelmer at samba.org
Tue Nov 24 23:07:25 GMT 2009
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:02 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> 2009/11/20 Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org>:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:10 +0000, Russel Winder wrote:
> >> Karmic comes with Dulwich 0.3.3. Is this the best version to use for
> >> bzr-git? Or is it still better to get a clone of the Dulwich Git
> >> repository and install from there?
> > 0.4.0 is a safer choice and fixes a number of bugs and performance
> > issues.
> Maybe we should ask for an SRU for dulwich too, semi-independently of bzr?
Yeah, that might be a good idea. This would have to happen in parallel
with any updates of bzr-git though (dulwich 0.4.0 breaks older versions
of bzr-git, I accidently put an API incompatible change in 0.4.0).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091125/6cd7b1b0/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar