Is Bazaar's document distributed under GPL?

[Ian Clatworthy]

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Ian Clatworthy writes:
>  > Robert Collins wrote:
>  > 
>  > > I think the GPL is fine for documentation, as already mentioned its
>  > > _more_ liberal for translators than GFDL. I'm not aware of any uses
>  > > (including the printing of dead tree books) that the GPL would prohibit.
>  > 
>  > My main concern is ensuring we don't unnecessarily restrict authors from
>  > creating training materials.
> 
> Huh?  In terms of what people can actually *do*, the GFDL is *strictly
> more restrictive* than the GPL.

I was arguing in favour of CC-BY-SA over GPL, not GFDL over GPL.

Ian C.