Things to remove for 2.0

[Matthew D. Fuller]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:02:03PM +1000 I heard the voice of
Ben Finney, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> It seem that without ‘bzr commit --local’, this requires the user to
> manually un-bind, which is a *persistent* state instead of being
> just for one commit. Why should the user need to remember that
> state?

The problem, as I see it, is that --local is MUCH more commonly used
by people who think they have a checkout, than by people who think
they have a bound branch.  And as long as it's sitting there in bzr
help commit, and we don't have any code barriers to using it in the
former (where it actually doesn't make any sense at all), it's an
attractive nuisance to people who don't understand what they're
getting into.


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd at over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.