Weird "info" with the '2a' format...

[Lars Hoss]

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Martin Pool<mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> [snip]
>> It's a known bug; in brief it's because 2a actually means a
>> combination of repo, branch, and wt formats and we don't always map
>> back correctly to that name.
>
> Thanks for the reply!  I won't file a bug report then.

In fact there is already a bug about this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/202083

Cheers,
Lars