Weird "info" with the '2a' format...

[John Szakmeister]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Lars Hoss<lars at woeye.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Martin Pool<mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> It's a known bug; in brief it's because 2a actually means a
>>> combination of repo, branch, and wt formats and we don't always map
>>> back correctly to that name.
>>
>> Thanks for the reply!  I won't file a bug report then.
>
> In fact there is already a bug about this issue:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/202083

I did see that, but it wasn't clear to me that it was the same bug
(that one was about the pack-0.92 format, IIRC).  I can see that
further down it eludes to the real problem.  Sorry for the noise!

-John