[MERGE] Some revision-info fixups

[Matthew D. Fuller]

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:51:02AM -0500 I heard the voice of
John Arbash Meinel, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> If you really prefer the aligned form, then I think we can go with that.

Well, I was just going from the pre-existing

    revno = '%4d' % (b.revision_id_to_revno(revision_id))

which sorta half-assed did the same thing, it just misaligned when you
got over 10k revisions or got into dotted numbers.  e.g., bzr.dev on
bzr.dev:

% bzr revision-info 1 10 100 1000 4401.1.4
   1 mbp at sourcefrog.net-20050309040815-13242001617e4a06
  10 mbp at sourcefrog.net-20050309064900-74935ffb7350b24b
 100 mbp at sourcefrog.net-20050326134153-3fd9d2c0ee5a06ce
1000 mbp at sourcefrog.net-20050729134025-9abbcae0d0faf25f
4401.1.4 john at arbash-meinel.com-20090604021546-n2pgaxdkilitdpq5


I just made it work consistently.  I don't have a particularly strong
feeling left-vs-right, though I think I like right better; on long
lists it makes it easier to match up.


> meh... (honestly, I wonder how often people ever give more than 1
> revision to this command anyway...)

Going from available evidence, every time they're doing unrelated
changed to revision-info and revno and notice a little mess in r-i
that could be cleaned up at the same time   8-}


> I'm probably going for the right-aligned, and I approve on concept.
> If you like my resubmission for your other patch, then the two will
> need to be resolved to work together.

At a glance (I didn't look in depth), it seems like your changes to
the other patch may have done most of this except the alignment stuff.


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd at over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.