Couple of general version control questions...
Richard B.
dj_deipotent at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jun 3 10:58:26 BST 2009
Correct on both points. :)
Thanks for the ideas everyone. I will play around with the various
suggestions to see what I find works best.
--
Best regards,
Richard B.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 10:16:13 AM, you wrote:
> Philippe Lhoste writes:
>> On 02/06/2009 15:07, Richard B. wrote:
>> > When I commit a fix/improvement, I don't want to include the .exe,
>> > .dll and .pdb files, but I do when I make a public release (ie. so I can
>> > debug any bug reports from customers).
>>
>> I don't follow you there.
> I'm assuming what he is saying is that he wants to be able to
> reproduce the state of his workspace exactly as it was when he rolled
> the release. He's not using bzr for distribution, and he's not
> distributing developer-only files. (Not to mention that he said he'd
> like to include his compiler, and since that's an MSFT product, as you
> point out distributing that could land him in big trouble indeed! :-)
>> If you just keep all the released packages, it is easy to get back
>> to a given version.
> But if the compiler changes (upgrade), the compiler bugs will change.
> In the case of a Heisenbug, he wants to be able to determine exactly
> what in his current environment is different from the release
> environment.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list