Loggerhead authorization file proposal
Mario
mario.danic at gmail.com
Fri May 29 16:16:14 BST 2009
Since loggerhead uses wsgi, I don't think https would be too hard to implement.
And I guess better security is definitely important.
Cheers,
M.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 17:10, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Mario <mario.danic at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jelmer and I have been thinking of adding authorization support to
>> Loggerhead, along
>> with smart server support. The goal of the authorization-configuration
>> files is to be simple,
>> therefore I propose the following:
>>
>> loggerhead-password (htpasswd type):
>
> I think that would be nice. It might be good (now or later) to
> consider optionally serving over https, and/or to require stronger
> Digest rather than Basic auth.
>
> --
> Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>
>
More information about the bazaar
mailing list