From Better SCM mailing list: Distributed VCS with good user verification?

[Martin Pool]

2009/5/8 Lasse Kliemann <lasse-list-bazaar-2009 at mail.plastictree.net>:
>> There's no immediate option to do this.  It would be useful; it should
>> probably be optional because verifying the signatures each time will
>> be substantially slower than just listing the revisions.
>
> How about caching the verification results?
>
> It should of course be guaranteed that existing revisions cannot
> be modified by a pull (merge, ...) from an outside source.

Yes, that would make sense.


-- 
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>