From Better SCM mailing list: Distributed VCS with good user verification?

[Lasse Kliemann]

* Message by -Martin Pool- from Thu 2009-05-07:
> 2009/5/7 Eugene Wee <crystalrecursion at gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I saw this on the Better SCM mailing list, and decided to forward it
> > here to see if anyone could help Lasse
> >  out:
> > https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/better-scm-discuss/2009-May/000051.html
> 
> There's no immediate option to do this.  It would be useful; it should
> probably be optional because verifying the signatures each time will
> be substantially slower than just listing the revisions.

How about caching the verification results?

It should of course be guaranteed that existing revisions cannot 
be modified by a pull (merge, ...) from an outside source. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090507/aa948dc3/attachment.pgp