Better name for dpush wanted

[Ian Clatworthy]

Brian de Alwis wrote:
> On 29-Apr-2009, at 1:25 PM, Nicholas Allen wrote:
>> I don't understand the problem with the number of commands. If you
>> reduce them then you add more options to the remaining commands and then
>> they aren't as discoverable. I think Bazaar's done a pretty good job of
>> coming up with names for commands that represent common concepts. I
>> would be against this kind of reduction of commands.

> I fear the push to reduce the number of commands, intended to help lower
> the learning effort required of novice users, will only hurt proficient
> and expert bzr users.  What really matters to novices is being able to
> create and evolve a meaningful mental model of how bzr's commands fit
> together.

And, for the record, my goal in raising the "one concept, one command"
principle was *not* to go back and revisit all our commands and make
bulk changes to them! The objective was to put forward a rule we could
adopt (or otherwise) in answering the "Where do we want to be before we
start making more incremental UI changes?" question.

I strongly agree about the importance of getting the mental model right
and going from there.

Ian C.