looms v. rebase (or, Where are the blogs?!) [was: Re: Will re-basing support be added into Bazaar core ?]

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 02:57 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Robert Collins writes:
> 
>  > How low do these numbers need to be not to force a change in workflow
>  > for you, should you use bzr.
> 
> Dunno.  On Mac OS X, git + elisp + HFS+ slowness is just at the
> threshold of perception, git itself about 0.1~0.2s for branch and most
> commits.  It wouldn't need to be that fast, but 0.7s might be enough
> to make me chafe.
> 
> We have a long vacation coming up at the end of the month ("Golden
> Week"), maybe I'll generalize my code and try plugging bzr in in some
> of my workspaces.

Please do. branch[with a shared --no-tree repository], status and commit
are bread and butter for performance. I should have a decent handle /
fix in place for the absymal branch timings I observed last night.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090423/f8dbfefe/attachment.pgp