Better name for dpush wanted

[Daniel Clemente]

El dv, abr 17 2009, Jelmer Vernooij va escriure:
>> My favourite is ‘push --foreign’.
>>   
> Apart from the fact that these are two commands that do related but
> different things (see above), I think that "foreign" is a bad name here,
> as it implies that option is necessary to push to foreign branches and
> that's not true; it's not even the recommended way to push to foreign
> branches.
>

  And --foreign-only?



-- Daniel