[MERGE/RFC] Userdoc Driven Design on the Bazaar 2.0 UI

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


...

> There may be technical reasons but, again from a naive user point of
> view [1], this does not sound very nice.  Imagine a developer in a
> university or company that works on a project X, using a checkout
> (they were previously using SVN).  One day, on a plane, having a few
> hours to kill, he decides to implement a few items on his todo list
> for X.  But he cannot commit each of his fixes because he has a
> checkout.  Too bad! (and too late, he should have foreseen this!). [2]

So at that point, I feel like they should be using "bzr branch" to
create a *new* branch, which is thus obviously disconnected (and not
just a hybrid form in an existing checkout). Rather than trying to wedge
a partially new branch into an object that they previously declared
should always be in sync.

Going further, perhaps "bzr unbind" would be sufficient, I *don't* think
"commit --local" is.

John
=:->


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknn3UYACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMNbACfVvBLAEF+Jau+8fVflCYTFoy/
0iAAn1TD1chVZdm8zlymYdN8da+KzKDc
=Vpo8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----