[MERGE/RFC] Userdoc Driven Design on the Bazaar 2.0 UI
Christophe TROESTLER
Christophe.Troestler+bzr at umons.ac.be
Thu Apr 16 11:59:03 BST 2009
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:40:46 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:40 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>
> I do like the docs. However I have some concerns too.
>
> > 1. checkouts should be lightweight by default (ala svn)
>
> There are serious performance implications in this. [...] Fixing
> them to have a local cache is ~= to using a stacked bound branch
> with sufficient fixes to allow disconnected use. [...]
Let me ask a naive question: what is the difference between "bzr
checkout --lightweight; bzr unbind" and "bzr branch --stacked" ?
Users coming from other VCS certainly expect checkouts to depend on
the original branch. Shouldn't "stacked" be conflated with
"checkout", with "--local" to have "bzr ci --local" by default?
My 0.02€,
ChriS
More information about the bazaar
mailing list