The Jelmer "fork" of bzr.dev

Robert Collins robert.collins at canonical.com
Sun Apr 12 13:01:32 BST 2009


On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 13:50 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 09:31 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> >   
> >> The appears a strong prima facie case for reverting the decision to
> >> remove svn+http.
> >>     
> >
> > I think having svn+http present is useful for cases such as these;
> > autodetection is great too, and they are not exclusive as far as I can
> > tell.
> >   
> 
> svn+http:// doesn't bypass the other detection though, it just happens
> to not implement all methods on Transport (at the moment) causing the
> bzr format probes to fail in different way than 401s.

It won't ever implement get_smart_* though, will it?

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090412/1b42d750/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list