The Jelmer "fork" of bzr.dev

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 09:31 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
>   
>> The appears a strong prima facie case for reverting the decision to
>> remove svn+http.
>>     
>
> I think having svn+http present is useful for cases such as these;
> autodetection is great too, and they are not exclusive as far as I can
> tell.
>   

svn+http:// doesn't bypass the other detection though, it just happens
to not implement all methods on Transport (at the moment) causing the
bzr format probes to fail in different way than 401s.

Cheers,

Jelmer