New 1.14 RC date?

[Talden]

> Can you please be a bit more specific as to what this format was and
> what bit you ?
>
> The development formats are clearly marked as such, and they're hard to
> find if you're not looking for them. The places where you do come across
> them explicitly mention that they're development formats and why you
> shouldn't use them.

A wild guess would be rich-root for bzr-svn.  Of course now there's a
non-development rich-root so that problem doesn't occur anymore.
Wasn't there a point where rich-root was required by bzr-svn before a
production rich-root format was available?

If a specific problem requires you to go to a development format (and
they're clearly marked as such) for a solution then surely the
interpretation is that a production quality solution to that problem
isn't yet available *but it's coming*.

--
Talden