[MERGE] * ``make dist`` now includes a number of plugins
Ben Finney
bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Fri Mar 13 02:52:50 GMT 2009
Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com> writes:
> What I'd rather do is: for small things that would make sense built
> in, and that perhaps are separate for accidental reasons, let's
> merge them in, give their previous authors core access, and add at
> least smoke tests for them if there are none.
I only get a voice as an interested user, but from that perspective:
I would very much hope that a prerequisite for *any* code entering
Bazaar (i.e. being “merged in”), the code must have tests that meet
the requirements of any other Bazaar code. I'd also hope that commit
access is withheld until the code meets that standard.
One of the primary reasons I evangelise Bazaar is that its code base
is very well tested; I don't want code to get in that merely has “at
least smoke tests”.
Take that opinion for what it's worth.
--
\ “Never use a long word when there's a commensurate diminutive |
`\ available.” —Stan Kelly-Bootle |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
More information about the bazaar
mailing list