Help with gatekeeper workflow.

[Eric Berry]

>
> The upside is it is the only way to merge if don't want to propagate
> tags, that I am aware of anyway.  I'd rather there was a --no-tags
> option on branch, push, pull and merge.


I agree, I would like this better.


> That should work.   I've used the human gatekeeper approach with bzr
> before, the only difference from your setup was User2 was required to
> provide a public branch.
>

Nice. :) Yeah, that would be ideal, and I'm still thinking about ways we can
actually do that here. The problem is, we'd most likely use this workflow
with some outside consultants where we have strict access management, and it
could become more maintenance than it's worth to maintain many public
branches in this manner. If I could figure a way to get it down to just a
couple public branches for them, it would be a better idea over send. :)

Thanks again!
Eric

-- 
Learn from the past. Live in the present. Plan for the future.
11101000
http://www.townsfolkdesigns.com/blogs/elberry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090305/33510bb2/attachment.htm