bzr-gtk vs. QBzr

[Alexander Belchenko]

I know there are many bzr-gtk users here. I guess some of them maybe tried QBzr.
I know some people have both plugins installed because some features are
unique to one plugin of two, and vice versa.

May I ask you to describe your thoughts, informal comparison between bzr-gtk and QBzr.
I'm one of QBzr developers and I'd like to understand differences better.
Last release of bzr-gtk was 6 months ago, although it's still in more-or-less
active development. I guess bzr-gtk is stable and mature tool then.

This poll was inspired by Marius Kruger's thoughts on things that should be fixed in bzr,
available on his wikipage. In particular he wrote following about GUI tools:

"""proper gui tools for windows people

Currently we have tortoiseBzr, but when I actually saw it on window, I was quite disappointed. It
uses qbzr which is far behind gtk-bzr. I don't know why they swithed. One of the main missing things
is the lack of a single gui tool which can do everything like olive. Even the stuff you can do by
rightclicking on folders in tortoiseBzr, is quite limiting. This forces users to the commandline
which is not acceptable for some.
"""