looms: compatibility, performance, alternatives?

[Jonathan Lange]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:28 AM, David Reitter  wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2009, at 16:57, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>>
>>> - Suppose a fellow developer does not have the bzr-loom plugin installed.
>>> When they get the branch, do they get all patches by default? Which
>>> thread
>>> are their commits assigned to?  Can I configure this?  I would want them
>>> to
>>> commit to the top thread (downstream, level 1).
>>>
>>
>> No they don't. They wouldn't be able to commit directly to the loom at
>> all.
>
> OK, sounds like looms are not meant to be used in collaboration.  That's a
> knock-out criterion for me.
>

They are meant to be used for collaboration, but you need to have the
bzr-loom plugin installed. The answers would be different if that were
the case.

jml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklmjRYACgkQX+0xPtMTonxhIgCfXpbWOIRg/c3zq/xjEVC9SzQI
nawAn1CK5HWwc+7B0VQ1Mih2cOEytXSZ
=ryH7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----